Skip to main content

Difference between In Band and Out of Band Protocols

In band
In-band control is a characteristic of network protocols with which data control is regulated. In-band control passes control data on the same connection as main data.In Band Protocols
Protocols that use in-band control include HTTP and SMTP.
SMTP is in-band because the control messages, such as “HELO” and “MAIL FROM”, are sent in the same stream as the actual message content.

Out of Band
In computer networking, out-of-band data (called “urgent data” in TCP) looks — to the application — like a separate stream of data from the main data stream. This can be useful for separating two different kinds of data. Note that just because it is called “urgent data” does not mean that it will be delivered any faster or with higher priority than data in the in-band data stream. Also beware that unlike the main data stream, the out-of-band data may be lost if the application cannot keep up with it. “Urgent data” notifies the receiving connection that the separate stream is more important than the main stream. Therefore it must first check the separate stream in order to process the main stream normally.

To Understand this, cosider the file transfer through FTP Protocol (an Out of Band Protocol)

FTP operates on the application layer of the OSI model, and is used to transfer files using TCP/IP. In order to do this an FTP server needs to be running and waiting for incoming requests. The client computer is then able to communicate with the server on port 21. This connection, called the control connection, remains open for the duration of the session, with a second connection, called the data connection, either opened by the server from its port 20 to a negotiated client port (active mode) or opened by the client from an arbitrary port to a negotiated server port (passive mode) as required to transfer file data.
The control connection is used for session administration (i.e., commands, identification, passwords) exchanged between the client and server using a telnet-like protocol.

For example “RETR filename” would transfer the specified file from the server to the client. Due to this two-port structure, FTP is considered an out-of-band protocol.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Basic MPLS BGP and L3VPN Lab Setup

In this lab, we’ve set up a basic MPLS, BGP, and L3VPN environment, which is a great foundation for understanding how service providers build scalable networks. The lab uses the EVE-NG simulator along with Router IOS C7200-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M, Version 15.2(4)M8 to emulate a realistic MPLS environment. Below is a summary of the key components and roles of each router in the lab. MPLS Core Routers : The MPLS core consists of the routers responsible for label switching and forwarding customer traffic through the network: PE1 (Provider Edge 1) : Connects customer networks to the MPLS core and handles both MPLS and BGP routing. It also hosts VRF (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) instances for customers. PE2 (Provider Edge 2) : Functions similarly to PE1, connecting another customer network to the MPLS core. P1 (Core Router 1) and P2 (Core Router 2) : These routers serve as MPLS core routers and handle label switching but do not store or process customer routes directly. They simply f

OSPF Adjacency Stuck in EXSTART on Cisco IOS XR – Issue and Solution

In a recent lab setup using Cisco IOS XR on EVE-NG, I faced a common but frustrating issue with OSPF adjacencies getting stuck in the EXSTART state. After spending considerable time troubleshooting interface MTUs and configurations, I discovered that the root cause was related to the virtual network interface type being used. This post outlines the issue, troubleshooting steps, and the eventual solution that got everything working. Issue: While configuring OSPF between two routers running Cisco IOS XR in my lab, OSPF adjacencies were getting stuck in the EXSTART state. I verified that interface configurations, MTU settings, and OSPF parameters were correct, but the problem persisted. I tried adjusting the MTU size, using the mtu-ignore command, and even checked for ACLs, but nothing seemed to resolve the issue. Troubleshooting Steps: MTU Settings: I started by verifying that both sides of the OSPF adjacency had matching MTUs. I used the default MTU and even tried different values wit

How to Properly Clone an EVE-NG Lab with Configurations

Cloning labs in EVE-NG is a great way to duplicate setups and expand or experiment on a new copy without affecting the original lab. However, if not done correctly, the cloned lab may only copy the topology without configurations. In this guide, I’ll show you how to properly clone a lab in EVE-NG with all configurations using the EVE-NG GUI . Follow these steps to ensure that both the topology and router configurations are retained when cloning your lab. Steps to Clone an EVE-NG Lab with Configurations Save Running Configuration on All Devices In your original lab, make sure all devices have their configurations saved to NVRAM. Go into the CLI of each router and run the command: copy running-config startup-config Export All Configurations (CFGs) On the left sidebar in the EVE-NG Web UI , click on the "More Actions" option. Then select "Export all CFGs" . This step exports the configurations of all devices in the lab. Shutdown All Devices After exporting the confi